To be singled out as having a “low propensity” for generosity is undoubtedly a bad rep, even if for some it represents exactly the reality of things, and for others it is even bragging in every sense. Being miserly can indeed be openly considered a “talent”, a form of foresight and the ability to be serious and conservative, but in the social sphere it represents the antithesis of success because being “bound” to material goods as well as ‘to money constitutes a form of materialism which leads us to “like” most of these qualities only in the professional sphere. Even the zodiac certifies that certain zodiac signs are on average more miserly. Which are they?
The stingiest zodiac signs! Which are they?
Cancer
He likes the good life but hates to spend. He is very good at reconciling the two things, indeed it is often the very thing that makes him the happiest, feeling good with little. But never wait for them to offer dinner or some economic/material gesture unless it’s necessary. Compared to other signs it does not “suffer” if it has to spend, but almost all expenses for this sign are superfluous.
Bull
Taurus is related to money. This would suffice to define his will to operate but it is not so simple, because he experiences great satisfaction in feeling covered economically speaking. Material possessions have an innate ability to define his mood far more than most people he knows. His being “morally” is a bit excessive but that’s his nature.
Sagittarius
He is a spartan personality, who lives a lot from day to day. On the other hand, this is only possible with a long process of “education” which is essential from an early age. Never going overboard with spending because “things can go wrong” is a kind of mantra that leads him to be almost morbidly attached to money.